Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: True or False.... Ft/Lbs.
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Rod (NH) on December 03, 2003 at 16:18:51 from (12.148.160.138):
In Reply to: True or False.... Ft/Lbs. posted by Just Curious on December 03, 2003 at 14:03:04:
Hi Just Curious, Odd name you got there :o). Here's another opinion. There is no valid term as ft/lb. What I think you mean is ft-lb which is an energy term. It represents a force acting THROUGH a distance on an object. Despite common usage, ft-lb is NOT a term that properly designates torque. Torque is a force acting AT a distance on an object not THROUGH a distance. Big difference. To acknowledge that difference, torque is properly termed as lb-ft and not ft-lb. The samples you provide develop an energy (kinetic energy) of 200 ft-lb and 300 ft-lb respectively. Weight times height. This is not a force. The actual force that is developed when the weight lands depends entirely on the relative stiffness of the weight and whatever the weight lands on. That amount of energy has to be dissipated (usually by deformation of one or both objects) upon landing in order to bring the weight to rest. Extremely high forces can be developed when hard weights land on hard surfaces. A steel cannon ball on a concrete surface for instance. In comparison, the force developed by that same cannon ball when landing on a pile of modelling clay would be much less due to the relative ease of deformation of the clay. The above is true if one neglects the effects of any change of gravity with height and the resistance of the air. Both are negligeable in the context of your question, I believe. Rod
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Restoration Story: Fordson Major - by Anthony West. George bought his Fordson Major from a an implement sale about 18 years ago for £200.00 (UK). There is no known history regarding its origins or what service it had done, but the following work was undertaken alone to bring it up to show standard. From the engine number, it was found that this Major was produced late 1946. It was almost complete but had various parts that would definitely need replacing.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|