|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: OT: banned insecticide
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Ron on July 15, 2004 at 12:05:46 from (69.179.21.81):
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: OT: banned insecticides posted by TimFL on July 15, 2004 at 10:52:14:
Very few things are "black" or "white" in life. There is some degree of harm inherent in every chemical, even some seemingly inncocent ones like aspirin. I certainly agree that we must conduct an assessment of each and do a fair and impartial analysis of the benefits and harm that each brings. The problem is the "fair and impartial" part. Not too long ago 7 liars who were heads of the major tobacco companies testified in front of Congress that cigarettes are not harmful. One even testified that they are beneficial. While Congress got this one right, they, and our federal and state governments continue to allow companies to lie about the dangers associated with the products they make. There is little risk for the companies to continue to do so. They make billions, poison us, lie about it, and then when they get caught years down the road, they pay off their favorite politicians to avoid any major consequences or, if they exhaust that avenue, they just go bankrupt. Society pays for all off this, that's us, the taxpayers, who foot the bill for everything that goes on in this country. The answer isn't easy, I certainly don't have it, but even if we had fair and impartial testing, who then sets the allowable risk limit? If a chemical helps 100 people but kills 1, it might seem like a fair trade-off, or is it? I guess it depends on whether you are one of the 100... or the 1. In any case, it should be up to us to make the decision, an informed decision, based on facts. As it stands right now, society cannot trust the companies nor the government to provide facts. The only thing that has changed in the last 40 years is that both of them have become much more clever liars.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Restoration Story: 1964 JD 2010 Dsl - Part 2 - by Jim Nielsen. Despite having to disassemble the majority of my John Deere 2010's diesel engine, I was still hopeful I could leave the engine-complete with crankshaft and camshaft-in the tractor. This would make the whole engine rebuild job much easier-and much less expensive! I soon found however, that the #4 conrod bearing had disintegrated, taking with it chunks of the crankshaft journal. As a resul
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2025 Yesterday's Tractor Co.
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|
