Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Liquid Ballast vs. Iron Weights
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Indydirtfarmer on July 29, 2004 at 06:46:35 from (66.83.236.250):
In Reply to: Liquid Ballast vs. Iron Weights posted by 720Deere on July 29, 2004 at 06:26:53:
I was following the thread on the John Deere board. Many good theories, all explained quite well. Last year about this time, I started an experiment of my own. I have one tractor that is used to pull a corn planter, cut and bale hay, and bush hog. It doesn't need much ballast for most of that work. (Actually needs MORE wieght to pull the round baler than anything) When using the planter, I mount a set of saddle tanks for liquid fertilizer on the tractor. That provides all the needed wieght to pull a 4 row no-till planter. (I use it on 1 farm, WAY away from where my 8 row planter stays) I want the wieght at some point, but when it comes time to plant, I want to be able to remove the wieght quickly, and easily. Iron wieghts accomplish that end. At the time when I was switching wieghts, I also removed the injector pump for a visit to the repair shop. I had to pull the tractor around with fluid in the tires (1450 lbs). Then I removed the fluid, and added almost the same wieght in iron wieghts. I had to pull the tractor around the shop with THAT set-up also. I used a garden tractor to move it on both occasions. With the fluid in the tires, and tires inflated to 15 PSI. the garden tractor almost didn't have the gonads to move it. With the iron wieghts, and the same tire pressure, it pulled significantly easier. Hmmmmmmm. Not exactly rocket science, but conclusive anyway. John
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Upgrading an Oliver Super 55 Electrical System - by Dennis Hawkins. My old Oliver Super 55 has been just sitting and rusting for several years now. I really hate to see a good tractor being treated that way, but not being able to start it without a 30 minute point filing ritual every time contributed to its demise. If it would just start when I turn the key, then I would use it more often. In addition to a bad case of old age, most of the tractor's original electrical system was simply too unreliable to keep. The main focus of this page is to show how I upgr
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2025 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|