Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Your thoughts on mineral rights
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by PKurilecz on September 19, 2004 at 08:19:09 from (69.148.70.126):
In Reply to: Re: Your thoughts on mineral rights posted by ChuckG on September 18, 2004 at 08:21:35:
Hello ChuckG: As far as these attachments go, talk to an attorney who is experienced in oil and gas law. If the minerals are severed from the surface estate, yes the mineral owners can extract the minerals. It is not necessarily done at a whim. It is only done if it can be profitable. It is my understanding that what consitutes "minerals" in Texas is somewhat unclear. It is my understanding that the legal theory is what is known as the "surface destruction" test. If the extraction of the mineral is such that the surface is destroyed and the surface rights owners use of the land is unreasonably impaired, then those minerals are attached to the surface estate and not the mineral estate. For example, suppose there is a vein of lignite 65 feet below the surface of the ground. A broad mineral rights reservation exists previously in the chain of title. To recover the lignite would require strip mining the land. It is my understanding that the mineral rights owner would not be able to extract the lignite as the strip mining operation would destroy the surface. But then again in Texas, it also depends on how good your lawyer is. As far as I know the issue is not fully resolved. Some theories that I have heard are based on the concept that the original grantor reserved the "minerals" did so because they thought that oil and gas might exist. One other general thought. If you are purchasing land from someone who owns a fee simple estate and the grantor wants to retain the minerals, you don't have to accept the wording of their reservation. As in any transaction, it is all subject to negotiation. Hope this helps. PKurilecz
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Restoration Story: Fordson Major - by Anthony West. George bought his Fordson Major from a an implement sale about 18 years ago for £200.00 (UK). There is no known history regarding its origins or what service it had done, but the following work was undertaken alone to bring it up to show standard. From the engine number, it was found that this Major was produced late 1946. It was almost complete but had various parts that would definitely need replacing.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|