Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: 901 swaps
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by James2 on January 14, 2005 at 19:23:37 from (207.179.239.76):
In Reply to: Re: 901 swaps posted by paul on January 14, 2005 at 07:41:25:
Paul: My father purchased a Ford 961 in the fall of 1958 which had a 4 cyl diesel. The engine failed within two years. Ford repaired the engine and installed internal balancers. We did not have any problems after that. An inline four cylinder is inherently more unbalanced than an inline three cylinder. I'm assuming that the crankshaft rod "throws" are not offset. The only good way to fix this is to add a crankshaft balancer. These are commonly two half shafts, running along the crankshaft operating one-half engine speed. If space is a limitation, the balancer can be concentrated (narrow) one-half weights/gears also operating at one half engine speed. But this introduces other moments which can result in other dynamic problems. A lot of OEM's will add more mass to the lower components (if needed for life), then try to use a flexible/dampening mounting system, In my opinion this is really only a band-aid and at best will only be marginally satisfactory, never really good. But none-the-less, I have seen a lot of "marginally satisfactory", highly cost effective arrangements during my tenure. The balancers add rotating mass so they do have a slight negative effect on acceleration, but it generally would still be light years better than a two cyl Deere. OEM's generally deal with three cylinder engine "shake" by optimizing the mounting arrangement which is theoretically more easily acomplished than on an unbalanced four cylinder. However, I have seen several production machines with "rocking and rolling" three cylinders. Bottom line is that I have seen/worked with 3 and 4 cylinder engines, balanced and unbalanced, and would rather have a balanced 4 cylinder rather than a 3 cyl. However, both take a back seat to the old tried and true inline 6 cyl.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Tractor Profile: Farmall M - by Staff. H so that mountable implements were interchaneable. The Farmall M was most popular with large-acreage row-crop farmers. It was powered by either a high-compression gas engine or a distillate version with lower compression. Options included the Lift-All hydraulic system, a belt pulley, PTO, rubber tires, starter, lights and a swinging drawbar. It could be ordered in the high-crop, wide-front or tricycle configurations. The high-crop version was called a Model MV.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|