Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: OT: Real world Diesel Mileage?
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Bob M on August 17, 2005 at 07:24:00 from (151.190.254.107):
In Reply to: Re: OT: Real world Diesel Mileage? posted by Hugh Mackay on August 16, 2005 at 18:39:41:
Indeed Hugh! I was thinking a max legal GCW combination with a 14L engine. Obviously a 466 and a lighter load will do much better. ---- You and Rod F have both touched on the major reason the current crop of diesel pickups give the fuel mileage figures they do - Weight to HP ratio. Consider this: A typical P/U might weigh 5,500# and have 250 HP – that’s about 22 lb per engine HP. On the other hand for an 82,000# tractor trailer with “typical” 450 HP engine it works out around 182 lb/HP. That’s a substantial difference! NOW if you were to build a pickup with a weight to HP ratio on par with the big rig it would have about 30 HP under the hood (and also a 10 or 13 speed manual transmission). This theortical outfit would probably be capable of 40+ mpg. But it’s unlikely few people would accept the sluggish performance and the constant manual gear changing required. (Or look at it the other way: The OTR truck would require whopping 3,725 HP engine… ….you’re talking railroad locomotive prime mover here….to equal the weight/HP ratio of the typical diesel pickup. Think THAT outfit would give 15 mpg?!!) The bottom line is it’s a tradeoff: Performance vs economy. The light truck market has demanded performance over economy, and the car companies have responded. ---- Incidentally you are right about the pulling ability of the 250 with a Super M on the flatbed Hugh. It walks it up hills almost as easily 1,500 RPM same it as at 2,500 - only difference is less noise!
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Grain Threshing in the Early 40's - by Jerry D. Coleman. How many of you can sit there and say that you have plowed with a mule? Well I would say not many, but maybe a few. This story is about the day my Grandfather Brown (true name) decided along with my parents to purchase a new Ford tractor. It wasn't really new except to us. The year was about 1967 and my father found a good used Ford 601 tractor to use on the farm instead of "Bob", our old mule. Now my grandfather had had this mule since the mid 40's and he was getting some age on him. S
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2025 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|