|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: state local farm bureaus need help opinion's
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Old Pokey on August 28, 2005 at 11:15:49 from (216.99.219.134):
In Reply to: Re: state local farm bureaus need help opinion's posted by Dave H (MI) on August 28, 2005 at 10:31:22:
Great, I'm not looking to debate it either. But basicly the limitations of use for the zoned EFU land. In oregon, where i am, at the state level at least, many limitations have been imposed upon our usage of the land without compensation or alternatives. The fb was either in support of certain restrictions or could not comment on their complete silence and lack of involvement on the others.
Just a quick example, and I'm not going into fine details, you can do that if you wish, as all info is publicly available. Say I own 200 acres of efu land. I have 3 kids. At the time I purchased the land, I could built 3 more houses on it for my kids to live in and raise their family. Now, I cannot built anything on my property unless I can prove over $80.000 gross income for 2 of 3 years per tax lot. I have to prove it, not just speculate it can be done. 200acres divided by 3 lots=66.6 acres. Non irrigated. Show me how to do this. This is a "hypothetical"?? situation mind you. Its close to one we have, but not excactly.
I was not compensted for these restrictions nor was I allowed a "grandfother in" clause. No alternatives have been issued. Where was the fb when all this took place?? In support of the new restrictions! Why?? Because other landuse committees have made trades will the fb for their support in other issues.
Again, not going to get into a P*****G match over it, just one the many issues the fb has sold us down the drain on and today those sell outs cost us too much money and freedoms. I will admitt that in the past there has been some incredible advancments that would not otherwise be possible without the fb. But that was when they could stand on thier own feet in the lobby. Those days are unfortuanatly gone.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Product Review: Black Tire Paint - by Staff. I have been fortunate in that two of my tractors have had rear tires that were in great shape when I bought the tractor. My model "H" even had the old style fronts with plenty of tread. My "L" fronts were mismatched Sears Guardsman snow tires, which I promptly tossed. Well, although these tires were in good shape as far as tread was concerned, they looked real sad. All were flat, but new tubes fixed that. In addition to years and years of scuffing and fading, they had paint splattered on
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
2022 John Deere 5045E, 4wd, front end loader and 3rd function with grapple. 120 hrs, 55k new, must sell
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|
