Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Opinions about McCormick W's
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Joe Evans on November 29, 2005 at 06:15:36 from (209.41.211.81):
In Reply to: Opinions about McCormick W's posted by Former gopher on November 29, 2005 at 03:29:26:

Here's a pic of the alpha and omega of the W-9 series. My W-9 is at ground level; a 650D is up on the trailer. The 650 is the great-grandson of the 9 and the last version of the basic design. That 650 is a horse at around 65 BHP. With its PS, live hydraulics and shaft, it would be a much more pleasant experience to wonk around on than my W-9. You need a lot of room to move these things around in--at least that's what the 9 needs. But heck, these things weren't built for jockeying hay wagons. They're more at home out in the Plains. We have guite a few Farmalls. When you spend time around anything, the shape, look and appearance get engrained in your mind. When I adopted the W-9 a couple of years agoan brought it home, its mass overwhelmed anything we owned except for maybe the 400. All our other stuff was narrow front row-crops--the Wheatland style tractor was just so foreign to us. Every once in a while even after two years, I'll catch my brother looking at the W-9 and muttering "...what a beast.." Despite the massiveness, the W-9 "looks right". It's well-proportioned and sits true and level with 16.9 x 34 rear tires on it. The only thing in my opinion that detracts from its look is the front axle. It appears to be a little undersized when viewed from the front--it doesn't have the overwhelming look of muscle that a JD Standard front axle has. On the other hand, it may have been IH's thinking that a massive front axle would detract from the rear axle weight bias. Don't know. One other thing that I need to add: I don't know if it was luck or just good design, but the W-9 is very well balanced when pulling a heavy load. There's good weight transfer to the rear axle. Whether it's from the hitch design, front/rear axle weight bias or both, that thing is one pullin' SOB.
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
12-Volt Conversions for 4-Cylinder Ford 2000 & 4000 Tractors - by Tommy Duvall. After two summers of having to park my old 1964 model 4000 gas 4 cyl. on a hill just in case the 6 volt system, for whatever reason, would not crank her, I decided to try the 12 volt conversion. After some research of convert or not, I decided to go ahead, the main reason being that this tractor was a working tractor, not a show tractor (yet). I did keep everything I replaced for the day I do want to restore her to showroom condition.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|