Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Why Not An IH 2+2 ?
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Brad in WI on December 01, 2006 at 01:50:40 from (24.208.17.159):
In Reply to: Why Not An IH 2+2 ? posted by davpal on November 30, 2006 at 23:44:18:
A friend has a 3788 2+2 and an articulating JD. I hate to say it but the JD is a nicer unit to manuever around the yard and getting to and from the fields. The 2+2 is just to long of a nose. The best of all is their CIH MFWD though.
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Check Your Coolant - by Bill Radford. Great tips on how and when to check the coolant in your tractor.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|