Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: oil bath or dry element
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by RAB on April 03, 2007 at 23:39:13 from (195.93.21.42):
In Reply to: oil bath or dry element posted by kyle boettcher on April 03, 2007 at 18:28:38:
A few misconceptions down here but most are covered in other posts although it is not always possible to know which post is right, when they contradict each other! B&D is a bit extreme when he compares one to t"other. The dry filter IS more efficient than an oil bath type. It does collect SMALLER particles as well. Don"t now what your "mil" is but particles down to upper single micron numbers are typical for a dry and a bit more for a wet - a micron is one millionth of a metre. Oil baths were not used for turbo engines as the oil mist would erode the impellor - anything will erode an impellor at 100,000 rpm and there is always some carry-over! There is no more chance of drawing the oil into the engine than on a normally aspirated engine, given the cleaner is sized correctly. So, yes a dry element is better, but the oil bath was perfectly adequate for the engine tolerances of the day. Lastly I know not how the differences in pressure drop across the various devices compare, but the oil bath type would only clog up when not working, too late to stop dirty air into the engine if pressure drop was used as a service indicator. The original reason for change to dry filtration? - probably initial production costs, as a tin box was cheaper than it"s predecessor. Or maybe Japanese motorcyles! Add to that other advantages, which came later, like access, shape (squeezing it under the bonnet), size, closer mechanical tolerances, waste disposal, it has been a good progression. Regards, RAB
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Choosin, Mounting and Using a Bush Hog Type Mower - by Francis Robinson. Looking around at my new neighbors, most of whom are city raised and have recently acquired their first mini-farms of five to fifteen acres and also from reading questions ask at various discussion sites on the web it is frighteningly apparent that a great many guys (and a few gals) are learning by trial and error and mostly error how to use a very dangerous piece of farm equipment. It is also very apparent that these folks are getting a lot of very poor and often very dangerous advice fro
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|