Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: oil bath or dry element
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by RAB on April 03, 2007 at 23:39:13 from (195.93.21.42):
In Reply to: oil bath or dry element posted by kyle boettcher on April 03, 2007 at 18:28:38:
A few misconceptions down here but most are covered in other posts although it is not always possible to know which post is right, when they contradict each other! B&D is a bit extreme when he compares one to t"other. The dry filter IS more efficient than an oil bath type. It does collect SMALLER particles as well. Don"t now what your "mil" is but particles down to upper single micron numbers are typical for a dry and a bit more for a wet - a micron is one millionth of a metre. Oil baths were not used for turbo engines as the oil mist would erode the impellor - anything will erode an impellor at 100,000 rpm and there is always some carry-over! There is no more chance of drawing the oil into the engine than on a normally aspirated engine, given the cleaner is sized correctly. So, yes a dry element is better, but the oil bath was perfectly adequate for the engine tolerances of the day. Lastly I know not how the differences in pressure drop across the various devices compare, but the oil bath type would only clog up when not working, too late to stop dirty air into the engine if pressure drop was used as a service indicator. The original reason for change to dry filtration? - probably initial production costs, as a tin box was cheaper than it"s predecessor. Or maybe Japanese motorcyles! Add to that other advantages, which came later, like access, shape (squeezing it under the bonnet), size, closer mechanical tolerances, waste disposal, it has been a good progression. Regards, RAB
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Old Time Threshing - by Anthony West. A lovely harvest evening late September 1947, I was a school boy, like all school boys I loved harvest time. The golden corn ripens well and early, the stoking, stacking,.... the drawing in with the tractors and trailers and a few buck rakes thrown in, and possibly a heavy horse. It would be a great day for the collies and the terrier dogs, rats and mice would be at the bottom of the stacks so the dogs, would have a busy time hunting and killing, all the corn was gathered and ricked in what we c
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2025 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|