Here in southern MN, I have resisted growing corn on corn for a long time. I just prefer rotating crops. It has to be better to rotate.
Well, corn yields keep going up, bean yields are in the dumpster.
I have some fields that are on their 3rd year of corn, and some of the better corn I've ever had.
Most folks around here are cutting back on beans, going to more corn.
I might be slow, but I'm not totally stupid. Corn is the crop to grow here, and corn on corn works a lot better than some of these 'slanted' studies show.
That fella that was winning the corn yield challenge year after year? He was planting corn on corn. He couldn't put the field in beans, it would drop his yield potential.
I don't suppose ethanol from corn is the answer to our energy needs. But it does help clean up the air a little, and it does offer to stretch our fuel supplies a bit.
I understand the most efficient blend is in the 20 to 30% range. More than that and the lower btu shows up. Less than that and you don't get the full benefits of the ethanol to make a properly burning mix that combines a good temp, flash front, octane, etc etc in current gasoline engines.
Oil has an established infrastructure (shipping, pipelines, trucking, drilling equipment) mostly brought about by govt subsidies and grants to start industry back in the 30's, and continuing through today. Ethanol - or any energy change - needs an equal footing on that. It is impossible to change from the entrenched fuel supply to something new unless we pay for that infrastructure.
Solar & wind electric generation has far bigger subsidies per energy produced. If we want to complain about subsidies, then we will not ever change to any other energy.
Studies are nice, but anything can be proven if you are looking to prove it. We need to look at the big picture.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Tractor Profile: Farmall M - by Staff. H so that mountable implements were interchaneable. The Farmall M was most popular with large-acreage row-crop farmers. It was powered by either a high-compression gas engine or a distillate version with lower compression. Options included the Lift-All hydraulic system, a belt pulley, PTO, rubber tires, starter, lights and a swinging drawbar. It could be ordered in the high-crop, wide-front or tricycle configurations. The high-crop version was called a Model MV.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
