Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: OT/alternative energy cost?


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by paul on February 11, 2009 at 13:14:17 from (66.60.197.88):

In Reply to: OT/alternative energy cost? posted by rrlund on February 11, 2009 at 09:52:03:

Left to our own, we will choose the lowest cost energy available.

That is why we have oil, coal, nuke, natural gas, and hysro. With some govt help to each of those, they continue to be the cheapest for various regions.

Alternatives will cost more.

Someday we will need to switch, when we find an alternative that is cheaper than what we are using now.

The govt dabbling & helping out certain alternatives is cool. Get that 1-2% online, and see how thay actually do work in the real world. All the other energy sources also got that starting boost, and continue to get help from the govt for infrastructure, etc.

Mandating some sort of huge shift in lass than 2 decades is crazy.

Ethanol & soyoil in diesel are a couple of examples. In my corner of the world, they actually make sense as the 2-15% of liquid fuels they are. It would not make any sense at all to mandate 50% of our liquid fuels come from ethanol or biodiesel - that would just be grandstanding.

Likewise, trying to get more than 5% of our electricity from wind generators in 15 years would be insane - building the heads, fabricating the blades - it takes resources & time. We can't make the capacity to build that many funcioning towers that fast.

It is just grandstanding to an audience that does not understand.

But, encouraging, and govt help to these sorts of alternitives is not a bad thing, if realistic goals and realistic build schedules are set.

Wind energy ebbs & flows, as the wind goes. It could never be more than 30% of our country's production, unless some massive storage systems are developed, which themselves become a drain on the efficiency of our power system.

But, perhaps getting to that 30% mark sooner, rather than later, would be a good move?

We need reality & time for these sorts of things. Not the political promises & mis-information.

Put it a total different way. People switched from LP records to CD's in about 5 years - because the CD was so much better, and was actually cheaper to produce. That was a rapid switch!!!!!

Society & the market will choose the best option for themselves, if it is out there.

--->Paul


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Restoration Story: Fordson Major - by Anthony West. George bought his Fordson Major from a an implement sale about 18 years ago for £200.00 (UK). There is no known history regarding its origins or what service it had done, but the following work was undertaken alone to bring it up to show standard. From the engine number, it was found that this Major was produced late 1946. It was almost complete but had various parts that would definitely need replacing. ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: 1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952 [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy