Posted by MarkB_MI on February 17, 2009 at 17:41:26 from (216.234.99.20):
In Reply to: Cheep Cars posted by john in la on February 17, 2009 at 06:05:51:
The thing to understand is that the Nano was conceived specifically for the Indian market. There is a huge pent-up demand for inexpensive vehicles as the middle class expands. All those men and women working the call centers in the middle of the night have money to spend, but not a lot. A lot of Indians have never owned any vehicle, not even a scooter.
GM has made some efforts to crack the Indian market, but the US automakers really don't stand a chance. Tata has the Indian market largely wrapped up. Tata is to India what GM, Westinghouse and General Electric are to the US, except in a single company. And Tata is fully capable of building a vehicle that could enter the US market, but their market share is in the developing countries, where expectations for comfort and safety are decidedly less that ours. In fact, a significant amount of engineering on US vehicles is performed by Tata contractors.
Just because the Nano is small doesn't mean it is necessarily unsafe. Understand that the typical cab in India is a three-wheeled rickshaw-like vehicle called an "auto". A collision between an auto and just anything else on the road (including cows) is likely to be fatal for the driver and passengers. But if you can't afford anything else, it's an acceptable risk. A Nano doesn't have to be that tough to be much safer than an "auto". I'm told that a lot of thought went into making the Nano crashworthy. For example, the spare tire is located in the front of the vehicle is such a way that it will crush and absorb energy in an impact.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Grain Threshing in the Early 40's - by Jerry D. Coleman. How many of you can sit there and say that you have plowed with a mule? Well I would say not many, but maybe a few. This story is about the day my Grandfather Brown (true name) decided along with my parents to purchase a new Ford tractor. It wasn't really new except to us. The year was about 1967 and my father found a good used Ford 601 tractor to use on the farm instead of "Bob", our old mule. Now my grandfather had had this mule since the mid 40's and he was getting some age on him. S
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
