I don't have the source at hand but do remember reading it or hearing it from a good source. I may search for it later. I may be mistaken and it is more related to going in to a port. Just like a cruise ship, most are not under our country's flag to avoid labor and tax laws.
The article you link to is a good one and it leaves the details of the matter open to interpretation. I do look at the goal of the person being interviewed in your article. He is with a company that gets hired to be the security force. They don't want the crew to take over the service they are trying to sell.
I sure don't take arming the crew lightly. It is as serious as it gets. When all other means of protecting a ship and its crew are up for debate, why are firearms almost totally excluded? It is within my reasoning that if you can be spraying the pirates with a firehose, you are within their range to shoot you. I don't discount the high pressure water as useful, just not the only option.
"Yes, the cavalry are there and will spring into action, but they might not be able to come to the rescue because they continue to hampered by outdated legislation, UN Mandates and international laws of the sea."
"The use of arms is a grey area. There is no set of clear legal rules laid down by the UN regarding protection against pirates and so the experience that any private maritime security company can draw on when providing protection is paramount. "
This whole matter reminds me of the politics of law enforcement. You are only to dial 911 and do whatever the bad guy tells you, no matter what. When you talk to rank and file officers, that opinion has much less endorsement.
Until the taking of ships becomes very dangerous, very painful, and without reward, it will only get worse.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - 12-Volt Conversions for 4-Cylinder Ford 2000 & 4000 Tractors - by Tommy Duvall. After two summers of having to park my old 1964 model 4000 gas 4 cyl. on a hill just in case the 6 volt system, for whatever reason, would not crank her, I decided to try the 12 volt conversion. After some research of convert or not, I decided to go ahead, the main reason being that this tractor was a working tractor, not a show tractor (yet). I did keep everything I replaced for the day I do want to restore her to showroom condition.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
