Posted by Jerry/MT on April 26, 2010 at 07:49:09 from (206.183.116.129):
In Reply to: Re: OT: Wolf posted by wyod on April 25, 2010 at 19:53:29:
There in lies the rub. The initial definitions for "sucessful wolf re-introduction" were 300 breeding pairs and I believe 1000 wolves in the three state area(MT,WY,ID)and federally approved management plans in each state , encompassing those animals. MT and ID had their plans approved but WY hasn"t. However the wolf was delisted in MT adn ID. There is a suit pending in MT that argues because WY doesn"t have an approved plan, no delisting should take place because the total three state region does not have approved management plans. The so called "environmentalists" are also saying 300 breeding pairs isn"t enough to maintain genetic diversity so they are now arguing for more breeding pairs. THe USFWS disagrees with their argument. I don"t know how the judge will rule but the technicallity is that all three states were supposed to have aapproved management plans before delisting and they don"t because WY"s plan isn"t approved. WY is also suing because they say they have the right to determine their own management plan. And so it goes. What everone agreed success looked like in 1995 is now being questioned by the "enviromentalists".
I say a deals a deal; sucess is 300 breeding pairs in the three state region is what was agreed to and no changing the rules now. There eare more wolves then what was agreed to (1500) and they are reproducing at a rate of 20% a year! MT and ID is hoping their hunting seasons will stem the tide and "educate" wolves not to go around humans and livestock. But a wolf has to eat and feed its young so when they run through all the deer and elk, in an area, livestock is next on the menu. And these so called "environmentalists" are supposed to be educated people! Maybe so, but they have no common sense and they are selfish and sef centered in their goals. To hell with the people who have to live with their definition of the environment!
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Earthmaster Project Progress Just a little update on my Earthmaster......it's back from the dead! I pulled the head, and soaked the stuck valves with mystery oil overnight, re-installed the head, and bingo, the compression returned. But alas, my carb foiled me again, it would fire a second then flood out. After numerous dead ends for a replacement carb, I went to work fixing mine.I soldered new floats on the float arm, they came from an old motorcycle carb, replaced the packing on the throttle shaft with o-rings, cut new ga
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
