Posted by MarkB_MI on November 12, 2010 at 14:36:02 from (166.203.160.129):
In Reply to: .223 or .22-250? posted by in-too-deep on November 12, 2010 at 10:38:29:
This is a difficult call. Twenty years ago there would be no question: .22-250 without a second thought. But the .223 has evolved a great deal since then, primarily because of the M16A2 and its use in highpower competition. When the military decided it needed to shoot heavier bullets in the M16, they increased its rifling twist to (I think) 1:8. The commercial AR and bolt action rifles followed suit, with the result that many new rifles chambered in .223 have twists of 1:8 or even 1:7. But .22-250 rifles typically have twists of 1:12 or 1:14. The result is that a typical .22-250 may have trouble shooting heavy bullets that a .223 can handle. On the other hand, light bullets in a .22-250 with a fast twist are likely to come apart in flight.
Now this isn't much of a consideration if you're planning to stick with factory ammo. But if you're a handloader, it's something to think about. I looked at the Remington site, and the M700 in .223 has a 1:12 twist versus the 1:14 twist of the .22-250, so it isn't such big difference for the Remington. Savage, on the other hand, goes with a 1:9 for the .223 and 1:12 for .22-250. That is a huge difference if you intend to shoot bullets much heavier than 60 grains.
Personally, I still think the .22-250 is one of the finest cartridges ever. It's the fastest .22 you can get that isn't hard on barrels. It is capable of outstanding accuracy with handloads. Most importantly, it literally vaporizes any varmint it hits. What's the point of shooting prairie dogs and woodchucks if they don't EXPLODE?
By the way, I love my .22-250, but I just went the other way this year and got a T-C Contender rifle barreled in .17 Fireball.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Product Review: Black Tire Paint - by Staff. I have been fortunate in that two of my tractors have had rear tires that were in great shape when I bought the tractor. My model "H" even had the old style fronts with plenty of tread. My "L" fronts were mismatched Sears Guardsman snow tires, which I promptly tossed. Well, although these tires were in good shape as far as tread was concerned, they looked real sad. All were flat, but new tubes fixed that. In addition to years and years of scuffing and fading, they had paint splattered on
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
2022 John Deere 5045E, 4wd, front end loader and 3rd function with grapple. 120 hrs, 55k new, must sell
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
