Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Ford 9N, 2N & 8N Discussion Forum
:

another option

[Show Entire Topic]  

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
ron,ar

12-25-2006 15:29:36




Report to Moderator

We used to use an automotive type ignition switch that had an off, on, and acc terminal. Instead of using the lamp or diode run the other wire to the acc terminal.




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Bob

12-25-2006 17:03:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: another option in reply to ron,ar, 12-25-2006 15:29:36  
The ACC method, under certain circumstances, can increase the chance of diode trio or voltage regulator failure. If using that method, it is a good idea to use a #194 lamp, a 10 Ohm resistor, or a diode in the lead to the #1 "switched excite" terminal on the alternator.

That's how GM designed the alternator to be used... with something in the circuit to limit or prevent the backfeeding of current, why try to get around the original design???

The diagrams below show what can happen without a lamp, diode, or resistor in the wire to the #1 "switched excite" terminal, if you care to take the trouble to peruse them.

Third Party Image

Third Party Image

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hah Bob

12-25-2006 18:22:47




Report to Moderator
 Re: another option in reply to Bob, 12-25-2006 17:03:23  
He's not trying to get around the original design, just passing along bad advise that someone else passed along from someone else that passed it along from someone that thought they know more than the engineers at GM. Pretty common on this forum.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ron,ar

12-25-2006 22:07:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: another option in reply to Hah Bob, 12-25-2006 18:22:47  
actually no, not bad advive at all, but a tried system that worked and worked well. I worked for a drilling company for about 8 years and we used this system on 71 series detroit engines running mud mixing pumps that we did want to run WOT.They needed a battery and charging system that was easily maintained. They gave very little trouble and ran at idle and mid throttle a lot, I mean a lot! As in 24/7 365 days a year. When a rig is bringing in 8600 dollars a day if it is running and nothing if it is down you don't use things that don't work. Try running your system that long and see how good it really is. I would venture to say charging system questions make up a large portion of this boards space. I gave good advice, you just don't want to hear anything different. You are no better as far as keeping with "original" design if you are putting GM charging systems on Fords anyway. Not to mention being a coward by not signing a name on your post. Unless you are known as "hah bob" here we will just refer to you from now on as "hah coward"!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Uh ron,ar

12-26-2006 05:30:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: another option in reply to ron,ar, 12-25-2006 22:07:14  
Well, now we know who the guy that knows more than GM is, he's working on a drilling rig somewhere. LOL If you weren't so busy insulting me, you would read Bob's post, which explains why your "advive" is bad. "My system" as you call it, is the one GM engineers designed and installed on several million cars, I believe that's a better track record than all the well pumps in the world. At least we now know why you drilled a hole in the top of your carburetor when you couldn't find the vent!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ron,ar

12-26-2006 07:54:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: another option in reply to Uh ron,ar, 12-26-2006 05:30:17  
I drilled that on advice given here as a diagnostic step. I do believe if you look back you will see that Zane gave that advice as did several others. I didn"t see you sneaking around "hiding" then too ashamed of yourself to openly argue your point then. Still a coward I see! You insult yourself by refusal to show your identity. And yes, I did read Bob"s post, I have the utmost respect for Bob and don"t doubt his expertise in electrical systems at all. I merely pointed out an alternative, one that worked for me and others in some of the most adverse conditions imaginable. As far as your GM engineers go, are those the same engineers that let GM head down the tubes because they couldn"t keep up with Toyota? If you keep up with such things you will know that electrical troubles (charging, starting, power distribution) constitute 63% of all of GMs warranty work. Doesn"t sound like a bunch that I would be tooting a horn for.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

12-25-2006 22:37:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: another option in reply to ron,ar, 12-25-2006 22:07:14  
Ron,

Sorry the other guy trampled you with both feet, but I stand by the advice in my other post.

Did you take a minute to look at the schematics showing how WHY using the "ACC" terminal on the ignition switch to avoid using a lamp, resistor or diode is a bad idea? Yes it DOES work, (at least 'til something goes wrong), but it introduces a "failure mode" that does not exist if the alternator is wired up as it was intended to be.

ANY fault, even a bit of resistance, in the charging circuit will cause the alternator's output current to take an alternate, undesirable path OUT of the alternator, through the diode trio and voltage regulator (which are not designed for this), and though the ignition switch's "ACC" terminal to get to finally get to the battery.

I repair alternators for a living, and have seen quite a few instances where repeat alternator failures were finally tracked down to the failure to use a lamp, resistor, or diode in the "switched excite" lead AND a fault in the charging circuit.

Several times, I've had to pack up some tools and go out in the field to see what was causing repeat failures, and, more than once it has been the lack of a device to limit or prevent current from feeding out of the alterntor's #1 terminal, BACK into the machine's electrical system.

So, sorry to disagree with your method, but I think wiring up an alternator in a way that will increase it's chance of failure is a BAD idea, especially when it is so easy to use a safer method.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ron,ar

12-26-2006 08:15:58




Report to Moderator
 hi Bob in reply to Bob, 12-25-2006 22:37:00  
I don't doubt your advice or expertise at all, in fact I have one of those 194 bulbs in my 48 N. I used a clearance light with a clear lens as it makes an excellent under the hood light for checking oil/fuel. I also have an 8N down at the farm that has the ACC setup and has been working fine since 1998 like that. I only suggested it because it worked for me and others in the past. Some folks don't like the key and push button system and understand the automotive type key/ign/ idea. Didn't mean to ruffle feathers but we ran several hundred of those 71 series detroits in very adverse conditions and they served us well. I can only report on what worked for us. I won't advise it again, but won't back off on the fact that we liked it enough to depend on it to make us a living. We made way more money if the equipment was up and running than if it was down for repairs.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
gee Bob,

12-26-2006 05:50:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: another option in reply to Bob, 12-25-2006 22:37:00  
All I did was point out that ron,ar had be mislead by bad advice, and was now passing it on. I don't see how that is "trampled with both feet".

He's the one that started throwing insults around, not me.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jim West TN

12-26-2006 06:59:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: another option in reply to gee Bob, , 12-26-2006 05:50:25  
Hi Georgia Peach from Douglasville, Georgia who doesn't have the guts to post with her name. Didn't your boy friend give you what you wanted for Christmas?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
No, but

12-26-2006 18:53:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: another option in reply to Jim West TN, 12-26-2006 06:59:13  
I got what I wanted from your wife.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Show Entire Topic]     [Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy