Re: 856 verses 1086 on fuel

Posted by scottAR on May 28, 2004 at 20:13:12 from (209.194.159.155):

In Reply to: 856 verses 1086 on fuel posted by Larry B. on May 26, 2004 at 05:24:53:

I had a 1066, 1086, 1466, 1566 and still have a 966. In heavy tillage there was no difference in the fuel consumption of all four big tractors. They all pull up to the fuel tank at noon. You could put any of them on an eight row planter and run for a day and a half. But, I would much rather have any 56 series tractor in a freezing dust storm than any 86 series tractor. They ride so rough since they moved the cab forward so you feel the front wheels bounce and they shift so bad.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Re: Re: 856 verses 1086 on fuel Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]