Re: Farmall 400 or 450

Posted by Hugh MacKay on November 23, 2004 at 02:20:14 from (216.208.58.138):

In Reply to: Re: Farmall 400 or 450 posted by Wayne Swenson on November 22, 2004 at 21:12:58:

Wayne: Just kind of curious in your responce, would that extra size on fuel tank eliminate the possibility of belt pulley attachment.

The reason I ask this is 656 diesels had second battery just about the same location on chassis. I'm hearing rumblings that the battery was moved back by fender on 666 and 686.

As horse power started its climb in the mid 50s, one of Farmalls shortcomings was size of fuel tank. I found the 560, 656 and 1066 diesels lacking fuel tank. 300 was terrible so I can well imagine what the larger gassers were like. 3 to 4 hours between fill ups was kind a pain in the butt.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Farmall 400 or 450 DWV 19:15:54 11/23/04 (0)
• Re: Farmall 400 or 450 Allan in NE 05:53:33 11/23/04 (0)
• Re: Farmall 400 or 450 Hayshaker5 05:37:09 11/23/04 (0)

Post a Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]