Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: Do I need a Hydro?
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Hugh MacKay on February 06, 2006 at 15:29:50 from (209.226.106.141):
In Reply to: Re: Do I need a Hydro? posted by Nebraska Cowman on February 06, 2006 at 10:02:30:
Cowman: Again no arguments, if you want pay the piper, it's your choice. It's a well known fact that hydraulic motors are an expensive way to transmit power, yet one of the very best ways when that power must be infinately variable. I you really must have hydro, put a 55 hp skidsteer against that hydro of yours and and he will run circles around you. He'll have the bale to the tub grinder before you get turned around. Now if I were advising someone to buy a round baler tractor, I'd say go Deere power shift all the way. Gives you all the speeds you'll ever need for the baler, will change directions faster than the hydro, plus it will have good drawbar efficiency. The very first farm applications we ever saw of hydrostatic drive were combines, and yes it allowed the operator to keep an even flow over the walkers and seives without wasting grain. Hydrostatic tractors became very popular on potato harvesters. Unlike the old chain diggers with 8' to 10' of chain now it was 40' of chain before the potato got to the truck. In order to prevent bruising they had to keep their speeds such that the chains retained a large percentage of the soil until close to the truck. Then you get into some of the precission vegetable harvesters where speed changes of .1 Kilometer per hour are necessary. These jobs have very high value compared to loader work or baling. I operated one of these machines a few seasons in the 90s, and the hydrostatics on the harvester were all computer controlled, the ground speed was 1.5 to 2 kpm canged by the operator. It had digital reading of speed and harvester components. That my friend is what hydrostatics were designed for. Now if your one of these wealthy mid west beef barons, who really cares what you drive.
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
The Cletrac General GG and the BF Avery A - A Bit of History - by Mike Ballash. This article is a summary of what I have gathered up from various sources on the Gletrac General GG and the B. F. Avery model A tractors. I am quite sure that most of it is accurate. The General GG was made by the Cleveland Tractor Company (Cletrac) of Cleveland, Ohio. Originally the company was called the Cleveland Motor Plow Company which began in 1912, then the Cleveland Tractor Company (1917) and finally Cletrac.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1997 cub cadet 7275 compact utility tractor 4wd hydro trans cracked block 3500
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|