Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: 350 vs. 560
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Hugh MacKay on October 09, 2006 at 02:18:21 from (216.208.58.154):
In Reply to: 350 vs. 560 posted by ezdoesit on October 08, 2006 at 20:22:21:
exdosit: I guess it depends on just how fast you wish to acomplish all of this. 560 is definitely going to have a lot more ability than a 350, but the 350 will be a lot more agile when it come to mowing, loader work, etc. I had both a 300 and a 560, the 560 was diesel, and would do more work on half the fuel. If I were you and had more than 50 hours work per year, I'd go diesel. I also had a 656 diesel and as years went on we found ourselves using the 300 less and less, and it was purely fuel consumption. I actually liked the 300 better for jobs like mowing, baling and loader work, but at 3 gallons of gasoline per hour versus 1 to 1.5 gph of diesel in 560 and 656 doing the same work, it wasn't hard to park the old 300. We weren't paying 2006 prices for fuel back in the 60s, 70s and 80s either. Interesting about H, 300, 350 size tractor and how IH destroyed it. 460 was just too cumbersome for 40 hp tractor. 504 diesel was a nice little tractor, but the wide front was too light. 544 was a decent tractor, but IH priced it too close to 656, thus sales really never took off. After that it was all basically British-German hi utilities. If it wasn't built in North America, I always avoided it like the plague. If a guy wanted a new tractor today under 100 hp, probably he may be better off getting the plague. I'd operated a few on them, all makes, they aint going to be around 50 years from now like those old Farmalls.
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Tractor Profile: Farmall M - by Staff. H so that mountable implements were interchaneable. The Farmall M was most popular with large-acreage row-crop farmers. It was powered by either a high-compression gas engine or a distillate version with lower compression. Options included the Lift-All hydraulic system, a belt pulley, PTO, rubber tires, starter, lights and a swinging drawbar. It could be ordered in the high-crop, wide-front or tricycle configurations. The high-crop version was called a Model MV.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|