Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board

Re: C301 block


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Gearnut on September 29, 2007 at 07:48:21 from (68.40.55.114):

In Reply to: Re: C301 block posted by the tractor vet on September 28, 2007 at 21:05:46:

Tractorvet, thanks for your reply. I completely understand the concept of boring-over vs sleeves.

But what I'm asking is do you have first hand personal knowledge of the topic at hand. ie: you've measured the wall thickness, or you have gone through some other measuring process to verify wall thickness (sonic testing for example) and have done the same on a 263 for comparison ?

And here's the reason I ask. If I were the engineer on the original casting, I would make all castings the same (say 3/8 wall thickness) and during final machining, machine the bore for a 301 and if it's a 291 or 263, either find a sleeve with a OD that matches the 301 bore or simply set the final bore to whatever the closest sleeve OD is available.

Given that, you could do the sleeve/piston replacement as often as needed, and bore the 301 once (.030) or twice (.060) before needing sleeves at some future rebuild.

Now it is possible they needed to "reduce" the casting wall thickness on a 263 for cooling reasons, ie: too much total thickness between the casting and the sleeve for the heat to transfer... and that could answer why (if it's true) a 263 has a smaller outside diameter cylinder casting.

Once again, I'm looking for "personal knowledge" on the subject and if your first reply was one of personal knowledge, just state the fact and I will thank you for your time and go look for a 301 block to bore out instead of wasting my time with a 263.

Mark
Thanks


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Identifying Tractor Noises - by Curtis Von Fange. Listening To Your Tractor : Part 3 - In this series we are continuing to learn the fine art of listening to our tractor in hopes of keeping it running longer. One particularly important facet is to hear and identify the particular noises that our ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: 1997 cub cadet 7275 compact utility tractor 4wd hydro trans cracked block 3500 [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy