Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board

Re: Which was a better tractor


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by LenNH on November 15, 2007 at 08:19:21 from (75.69.99.42):

In Reply to: Which was a better tractor posted by Idaho Ron on November 14, 2007 at 19:43:40:

Some good advice in the other letters here. I agree with others--it boils down to what you need. Some years ago, I found a Ford 2N, somewhat bedraggled, but useable after a valve-job, and I bought it to work a 3-point mower to cut a huge "lawn" (that's another word for a hayfield that you want to use to extend the lawn next to the house). I had spent all my years on the farm with an IHC 10-20 on steel, a couple of F-20s, a Regular" Farmall, an F-12 on rubber and one on steel, an A borrowed from a neighbor whenever I had the nerve to ask (delightful tractor to drive), an enormous and very clumsy 1930 Oliver Hart-Parr Row-Crop belonging to my grandfather, and finally a couple of Hs and a Super M. The Ford, as old as it was, was a revelation. Low (great under tree limbs), short and agile (great for zooming up to a fence and whipping around in a circle for the backswath), easy to get on and off of, and so on.
Didn't care much for the left brake pedal being outside the clutch--how do you use a brake pedal to make a tight turn somewhere when you also need to "inch" along with the clutch pedal? Engineers probably don't use some of the stuff they design, I guess.
The 3-point hitch was my first experience with that wonder, too, as was the hydraulic system that allowed complete control in either direction, instead of just "up" or "down" as with most of the power lifts from the 30s that I'd had experience with.
Moved around, sold the Ford. Recently, needed something to mow a large "lawn" (there's that hayfield again) where I now live, and found a tiny Ford 1100 (ONLY 35 years old! And it's not RED), and am having the same delight with the compact design, low to the ground, agile, great lift system, 3-point hitch, etc., etc.
One of the things I had never experienced was having 10 (count 'em!) gears, which give you an incredible range of speeds for work requiring the PTO to be up to speed (mowing, bush-hogging, etc.). One of the drawbacks of the A, B, C series was that they had only 4 speeds, with just 1-2-3 available for work. A Cub is not only not very powerful, but has only THREE speeds. Usually 1st gear in any of these tractors is slow enough for mowing or bush-hogging, but not always. I've done a lot of bush-hogging with an H in meadows dotted with "hassocks," and I thought that even first gear was too fast when the going got rough. My "new" Ford will go slower than a person can walk comfortably, and still keep the engine/PTO speed up. I can't say this little compact is as exciting as one of those beautiful, sleek Farmalls--LOVED looking down the hood of that Super M and listening to the throaty roar of the exhaust--but for my purposes, it works. When I get more money, if ever, and I can convince my wife that I need more tractors, I'll get me an H, a Super M, an A, a Cub, a six-speed John Deere A, an Oliver 77, a Titan 10-20 (now there's a dinosaur),
and......let me think. Just kidding. Or am I?

I've spent a lot of time talking about the compact quality of the Fords. The tall tractors don't work very well under trees, and if they are of the larger variety, H and bigger, they can be clumsy in tight quarters. Of course, by sometime in the fifties, many manufacturers were making tractors similar to Ford, Ferguson, Massey-Ferguson. I don't remember much about IH efforts in this area, but I believe they eventually had something low and compact, with some form of "fast hitch," if not the 3-point. If you have ever attached equipment the old way (with numerous bolts used to attach cultivators or the false-drawbar that carried the IHC sickle-bar mowers of the 30s and 40s), you appreciate the wonderful 3-point hitch and hydraulic system that Harry Ferguson brought to Henry Ford.
Ah, some people really like to ramble, don't they? Well, you are very patient. My wife's eyes glaze over by the time I reach the second sentence when I am talking about tractors.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Identifying Tractor Noises - by Curtis Von Fange. Listening To Your Tractor : Part 3 - In this series we are continuing to learn the fine art of listening to our tractor in hopes of keeping it running longer. One particularly important facet is to hear and identify the particular noises that our ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: 1997 cub cadet 7275 compact utility tractor 4wd hydro trans cracked block 3500 [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy