Posted by karl f on September 15, 2008 at 21:31:49 from (4.159.218.202):
In Reply to: Re: 656 or 560 posted by Lee in Iowa on September 15, 2008 at 19:57:22:
physical size isn't the whole story, though. The infamous 460 and 560 rear end failures come to mind. THe 656 should be better designed than the 460 and 560, even after the updates. from my observations in the parts books, it appears the 656 has an extra needle bearing pair in the differential that the older models do not have, and the pinion shaft bearings look different as well. Progress at work.
For the original poster's uses, the rear end is a non issue, but I wanted to make my point that a 656 is not less of a tractor than a 560.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
