Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Re: Re: OT - Seeking wisdom, idioms for building out an attic
[ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by PatM on September 12, 2002 at 06:45:05 from (64.25.14.122):
In Reply to: Re: Re: OT - Seeking wisdom, idioms for building out an attic posted by SHEP READ THIS REPLY on September 11, 2002 at 13:40:01:
You need to read my response more carefully. I did ask about the plans (second paragraph), and whether the walkout was made clear, then proceeded on the assumption that this desire had been made clear. No, Shep didn't mention cutting trusses, but I've seen a too many people, both homeowners and "professional" contractors, start cutting into truss members in similar situations. Again, this was preceded by the qualifier "if". Obviously, Shep and the builder were smart enough to know better. I have not read the contract between the two parties. However, if the contractor agrees to build to Shep's plans, and further agrees to take responsibility for the engineering, plan submittal/approval and construction to Shep's plans, and then fails to to provide the engineering, and submittal/approval to those plans, and fails to build in accordance with those plans, the builder is generally held responsible for the cost of correcting his error. Whether Shep decides to pursue strict adherence to the original plans (and to spend the time, money and effort to do so), or to reach a different, mutually satisfactory accommodation is a different question. I do know that Shep put a lot of upfront time and effort into planning the house, probably a lot more than most. After reading Shep's response to your post, I stand by my response. A contractor's decisions are driven by time and cost, as they should be. His obligation is provide the most cost effective solution to a clients needs, and he is in business to make money. Most often this works to the mutual benefit of owner and contractor; however, sometimes the "make money" part results in decisions that do not benefit the owner. Based on Shep's response to your post I believe the latter is what happened.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
12-Volt Conversions for 4-Cylinder Ford 2000 & 4000 Tractors - by Tommy Duvall. After two summers of having to park my old 1964 model 4000 gas 4 cyl. on a hill just in case the 6 volt system, for whatever reason, would not crank her, I decided to try the 12 volt conversion. After some research of convert or not, I decided to go ahead, the main reason being that this tractor was a working tractor, not a show tractor (yet). I did keep everything I replaced for the day I do want to restore her to showroom condition.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|