Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Re: Re: Benefits of higher compression?.
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Neil on June 27, 2004 at 00:04:40 from (138.88.15.38):
In Reply to: Re: Re: Benefits of higher compression?. posted by Additionally...Jerry/MT on June 26, 2004 at 18:08:08:
Cool! I like it when we get scientific. Assuming the same displacement, it is indeed the increased cylinder pressures throughout the power stroke that cause the increase in power with increased compression. As you pointed out an engine with 8:1 compression will, theoretically have 50% more peak pressure (around top dead center) than an engine with 6:1 compression ratio. As the piston progresses down the cylinder the difference between the pressures decreases until they are virtually identical at bottom dead center. In order to determine how much more power will be made we need to determine how much higher the pressure in the higher compression engine is on average during the power stroke. Which is the same thing as saying we need to determine how much greater the thermodynamic efficiency of the higher compression engine is. Unfortunately, it seems I threw out my thermo book the last time I moved. Fortunately, the internet is a wonderful place and you can find an explanation of compression ratio and thermodynamic efficiency at the following website – http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/thermo/design-library/otto/otto.html As you can see there the equation for thermodynamic efficiency is: 1 – 1/(r^(k-1)) where: r = compression ratio k = Cp/Cv (which = 1.4 (you’ll just have to trust me on this one (thanks for the assist Jerry, I wouldn’t have remembered what it was otherwise)) Plugging and chugging, we arrive at the following theoretical thermodynamic efficiencies for various compression ratios: 4:1 – 42.6% 5:1 – 47.5% 6:1 – 51.2% 7:1 – 54.1% 8:1 – 56.5% 9:1 – 58.5% 10:1 – 60.2% 11:1 – 61.7% 12:1 – 63.0% 13:1 – 64.2% 14:1 – 65.2% This is also shown graphically on the above-listed website. Now, to find the theoretical increase in power from one compression ratio to another, one divides the thermodynamic efficiency of the higher compression ratio by the thermodynamic efficiency of the lower compression ratio. For example, to figure out the theoretical increase in power from a 6:1 compression ratio to a 8:1 compression ratio, one divides the thermodynamic efficiency at 8:1 (56.5%) by the thermodynamic efficiency at 6:1 (51.2%). 56.5/51.2 = 110.4% Thus, the theoretical increase in power by going from 6:1 compression ratio to an 8:1 compression ratio is 10.4%. The theoretical power gains for each of the 1 point jumps is listed below 4:1 – 5:1 = 11.5% power increase 5:1 – 6:1 = 7.8% power increase 6:1 – 7:1 = 5.7% power increase 7:1 – 8:1 = 4.4% power increase 8:1 – 9:1 = 3.5% power increase 9:1 – 10:1 = 2.9% power increase 10:1 – 11:1 = 2.5% power increase 11:1 – 12:1 = 2.1% power increase 12:1 – 13:1 = 1.9% power increase 13:1 – 14:1 = 1.6% power increase It should be noted that the theoretical power increase is also the theoretical torque increase. It is also worth mentioning that the equation for the theoretical increase in torque for a displacement increase combined with the necessary head and cam work to fill those extra cubes is considerably simpler - it is the new displacement divided by the old displacement: New Displacement/Old Displacement Thus, while a 33% increase in compression ratio (from 6:1 to 8:1) will yield a 10.4% increase in torque, a 33% increase in displacement coupled with the appropriate intake work will yield a 33% increase in torque.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
When Push Comes to Shove - by Dave Patterson. When I was a “kid” (still am to a deree) about two I guess, my parents couldn’t find me one day. They were horrified (we lived by the railroad), my mother thought the worst: "He’s been run over by a train, he’s gone forever!" Where did they find me? Perched up on the seat of the tractor. I’d probably plowed about 3000 acres (in my head anyway) by the time they found me. This is where my love for tractors started and has only gotten worse in my tender 50 yrs on this “green planet”. I’m par
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|