Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: if you had your choice.


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by RodInNS on July 18, 2010 at 05:19:01 from (216.118.158.123):

In Reply to: Re: if you had your choice. posted by MF Poor on July 18, 2010 at 02:46:21:

and the reason for emperical test data is to rule out what billybob said.... because billybob was a fan of one or the other tractor. If you look on Youtube you can find videos of a Fendt 930 hooked bar to bar with a large Kirovets FWD. The Kiro probably has several tonne of weight and a bunch of power on the Fendt (I'm assuming from the size of it)... yet the Fendt used some very carefull ballast placement, a high hitch point and the finesse in it's transmission controls to drag the big Ruski all around the yard on concrete. It really made the big tractor look foolish. Probably 90% of the reason for this was that the Fendt was hitched a good foot or more higher in the air and it was literally pulling most of the Kirovets ballast off it's rear.
If someone had changed the hitch points the Kirovets would have made mincemeat of the Fendt...
Just because someone can take those two tractors and set one up to it's advantage and the other to a distinct disadvantage... then turn around and say one is better than the other... it's pointless.
On the respective drawbar tests the Ford 3000/3600 outpulled the MF 135 by nearly 1000 pounds of pull when hooked to the same test car on the same concrete track, no doubt with the same test engineer supervising.
That's a reflection of available torque/power and the ballast to get it hooked. That's also a figure of nearly 20%. At the same time the Ford burned probably close to 20% more fuel.
So for the purpose of achieving maximum pull on a known comparable surface (concrete), the Ford wins hands down with the gearing and power it has. That's not to say that this particular gearing scheme is usefull for anything. Just that it can pull more at ~5 mph. If you used yours at 3 mph the comparison between them might be quite different. If you used different impliments or hitch points the result could be very different...But if the next guy wants to work the pair at 5 mph then the MF is going to get eaten for lunch...

Beyond that I can't see what major differences you see in them. They both have the same helpless brake system and light axles, nearly the same curb weight and wheelbase, much of the same poor Lucas elecrics because at their hearts, both are UK derived tractors.

Rod


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - A Question for Dads This recent topic from the Tractor Talk discussion board is being highlighted because it is an awesome display of the caliber of individuals that have made this site their own. The young person asking questions received positive feedback and advice from total strangers who "told it like it is" with the care many reserve for their own kids. The advice is timeless... so although it isn't necessarily antique tractor related, it will be prominently displayed in our archives to honor those who have the courage to ask and those who have the courage to respond in an honest, positive manner. ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: 1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952 [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy