Posted by Paul on November 26, 2013 at 07:25:54 from (66.60.223.232):
In Reply to: Re: Beat to death posted by oldtanker on November 26, 2013 at 03:37:41:
Oh, goodness, thought we were past this at least. If you don't like ethanol fine, but at least there is ample science and work out there to be past this part by now.
Many good sources out there, Wikipedia is not always a perfect source, but if you start there they show the 1.3% return on ethanol in the USA that is the common, well researched, result I thought everyone knew about by now.
Read the abstract for the core info you all are asking for, you can download the whole report and read the whole dry paper for free.
There are many other sources out there.
There was one study, by a Big Oil guy, that factored in the sunlight as a cost in some slight of hand way, and also took the ddgs high protein, high mineral feed we get left from ethanol and just hauled it to a landfill I guess, and his one study, which has been discredited over and over and over as pure bunk, is likely what you are basing your ideas off of.
To each their own, but wrong is wrong.
Lot of research and science points to positive energy gain from:
Corn ethanol in the USA 130% efficient or so. Milk production in the USA 110% efficient or so. Certain types of beef production in the USA, tho not all feeding systems - quite varriable depending on how you value non- productive grasslands.
Farming is one of the few bright spots on efficiency in the USA, I'm just always plumb surprised folks on a more rural, more country oriented site like this are so totally anti-farm and need to stretch things to be so.
And now, as I often say, corn ethanol is -not- the solution to all the worlds energy problems, it is but a small player, offers us perhaps a 3% increase in transportation fuel is all. Evern with cellulosic added in down the road, wont get to be more than 6- 10% energy increase.It will never ever replace all fuel. But it is surprising how much extra jingle we all get to keep in our pockets with just that small 3% gain over the last 5-10 years.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Restoration Story: Fordson Major - by Anthony West. George bought his Fordson Major from a an implement sale about 18 years ago for £200.00 (UK). There is no known history regarding its origins or what service it had done, but the following work was undertaken alone to bring it up to show standard. From the engine number, it was found that this Major was produced late 1946. It was almost complete but had various parts that would definitely need replacing.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
