|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Long Distance Hauling Advice?
[ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Truck. witrh an explanation. on December 13, 2000 at 20:42:02 from (172.144.244.227):
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Long Distance Hauling Advice? posted by RayE on December 13, 2000 at 17:27:30:
Okay, didn't mean to stir up a rats nest, but....
Given the fact that you can damage the drivetrain of a tractor by leaving it in gear during trailering.( Ever ride a gooseneck trailer? It makes those bucking bronco rides at the fair seem tame!)This is why 4 separate chains are preferred.
Remember we are not looking to see what we can get away with, but what will be safest in all forseeable conditions.
If you have one chain, going thru an eye on the front of the vehicle, and one similarly mounted chain on the rear of a load like a backhoe, what will happen if by chance we have a severe strain on the chain , such as would happen during an accident?
If only ONE LINK breaks, you have a loose load. There are no forces now opposing the other chain, so it gets loose also.Bye bye backhoe.
Now if you had two separate chains on the front, and ONE LINK busted, the load still would have an opposing force to the rear chains. The load remains still.
Now that one link busting could be replaced by a weld breaking on the tie down loop, a kink coming out of a knotted chain, or a load shifting sideways and allowing chains to loosen. Even a slow leak in the tires on the vehicle can cause loosening on the chains.
In the towing industry it is common practice for untrained operators on car carriers to use only the tow cable on the front of a car and one rear chain. There have been people killed as a result of such arrangements, mainly because chains loosened during emergency manuevers or accidents.
You can break DOT regs, but you cannot break the laws of physics.
All said, yup, I have gotten away with one front and one rear chain. But the best procedure, and the safest, is to use one at each corner on a rollable load.Let's do it right so DOT doesn't need to make us another target group.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
12-Volt Conversions for 4-Cylinder Ford 2000 & 4000 Tractors - by Tommy Duvall. After two summers of having to park my old 1964 model 4000 gas 4 cyl. on a hill just in case the 6 volt system, for whatever reason, would not crank her, I decided to try the 12 volt conversion. After some research of convert or not, I decided to go ahead, the main reason being that this tractor was a working tractor, not a show tractor (yet). I did keep everything I replaced for the day I do want to restore her to showroom condition.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|
